So, wet hair is the new fauxhawk/pixie cut/white-girls-getting-weaves, or something.
I’m not picking on Bronwyn Williams, specifically; Stuff just happens to be my go-to for “mildly amusing cheese-journalism”, especially in the workplace.
But in this post, the inherent problem of “*F*ashion” is perfectly illustrated: the instinctive “but … you’re deliberately going out looking like your hair is wet (and have spent a great deal of time and product to achieve a done-nothing effect)! Is that, like, okay?” clashes with the fact that if Heidi Klum does it on the red carpet and fashion designers all over the world are sending models out on the runway looking that way, it must be fashion.
Personally? *saddles high horse* I think if that is a look that aesthetically pleases you, you rock that look.
Like most things, your preferences are unfortunately already biased and affected by the environment you’ve grown up in (so good white middle-class girls like Bronwyn Williams and I instinctively read the wet-hair look as “untidy” or “uncaring”, for example). But how much or how little you care about those biases is really up to you – so whether you just reject the wet-hair look out of hand because it doesn’t grab you that much anyway, or want to give it a go to see how it works on you, or immediately embrace it as your One True Hairstyle for life, that is totally your call.
It’s just hair. It’s not hurting anyone. And for “hair” in that sentence back there? Substitute leggings. Or miniskirts. Or heels, or flats, or ultra-femme makeup or no-makeup makeup or literally-no-makeup.
I am a little interested in what trends designers are using or discarding. I certainly rejoice when things which fit my personal style are hitting the runway, because it usually means it’ll be easier for me to find those kinds of items in the shops I can afford to patronise. But I think it’s also good to let go of the idea that something being “on-trend” or “totally in this season” has any real meaning in of itself. It can’t be quantified, for a start. And we all know it’s going to change in a matter of months, and what becomes “fashion” does so largely by luck (one designer has the idea, another designer likes it, a magazine editor says THIS SHALL BE “IN” and sticks it on the cover and there you have it).
And at the end of the day, wet-look hairstyles are now “fashion”, the concerns of Stuff’s fashion blogger notwithstanding. Because a lot of people who are marked as Fashion Icons are doing it (there’s probably some kind of points system). Whether we think it looks tidy or not.
(Also, from a fatty perspective? By default, we basically cannot look tidy or fashionable no matter what we do, so do what thou wilt, sistren!)
(Also also, pic from this Daily Fail story, which hilariously captions another picture as “Adele as she usually looks”. No, Daily Fail, Adele as she looks for the purposes of media coverage. Pretty sure that pic above is a lot closer to Real Everyday Adele.)














